Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650
- Performs up to 42% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 51 vs 36 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
51
100%
Value, £/FPS
£2.74/FPS
100%
Price, £
£139.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £139.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 64 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
36%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
41%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
GeForce 16 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$149 | MSRP | $149 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
128.1 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1485 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1665 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2001 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |