Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100

GeForce GTX 1650 vs Radeon Pro WX 2100: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

vs
FPS Winner

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

vs

Key Differences

In short — GeForce GTX 1650 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1650 is 688 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.

Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

  • Performs up to 42% better in Elden Ring than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 51 vs 36 FPS
  • Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 4 vs 2 GB

Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

  • Consumes up to 53% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 35 vs 75 Watts
This is a free version of Elden Ring.
Elden Ring

Elden Ring

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


FPS

51

100%

Value, £/FPS

£2.74/FPS

100%

Price, £

£139.98

100%

FPS and Value Winner

MSI GeForce GTX 1650 D6 VENTUS XS OCV3 Gaming Graphics Card - 4GB GDDR6, 1620MHz, PCI Express x16 3.0, 128-bit, 1x DP, HDMI 2.0b

Buy for £139.98 on Amazon

In Stock

Updated 64 minutes ago

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017


FPS

36

70%

Value, £/FPS

Price, £

TOP 5 Games

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Maximum

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017

Theoretical Performance

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo
GeForce GTX 1650

Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019


Pixel Fillrate

53.28 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

93.24 GTexel/s

100%

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo
Radeon Pro WX 2100

Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017


Pixel Fillrate

19.5 GPixel/s

36%

Texel Fillrate

39.01 GTexel/s

41%

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 Logo

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650

vs
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 Logo

AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100

Apr 23rd, 2019
Release DateJun 4th, 2017
GeForce 16GenerationRadeon Pro
$149MSRP$149
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPortOutputs1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort
NonePower ConnectorsNone
Desktop
Segment
Desktop
4 GB
Memory2 GB
GDDR5TypeGDDR5
128-bitBus64-bit
128.1 GB/s
Bandwidth48 GB/s
1485 MHz
Base Clock Speed925 MHz
1665 MHz
Boost Clock Speed1219 MHz
2001 MHz
Memory Clock Speed1500 MHz

Builds Using GeForce GTX 1650 or Radeon Pro WX 2100

Elden Ring, 1920 x 1080, Maximum

Similar GPU Comparisons

Select from the most popular similar graphics card comparisons. Most compared graphics card combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.

Copyright © 2024 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.