Key Differences
In short — GeForce RTX 3050 outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce RTX 3050 is 1675 days newer than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 - 35 vs 130 Watts
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050
- Performs up to 116% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 108 vs 50 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 8 vs 2 GB
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for £173.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74354 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
34.2947590573338%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
27.433192686357245%
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
100%
AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 | vs | NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 |
---|---|---|
Jun 4th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Radeon Pro | Generation | GeForce 30 |
$149 | MSRP | $249 |
1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | GDDR6 |
64-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
48 GB/s | Bandwidth | 224 GB/s |
925 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1552 MHz |
1219 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1777 MHz |
1500 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |