Key Differences
In short — GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB outperforms Radeon Pro WX 2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB is 290 days older than Radeon Pro WX 2100.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
- Performs up to 75% better in Starfield than Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 21 vs 12 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 - 3 vs 2 GB
Advantages of AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB - 35 vs 120 Watts
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Theoretical Performance
GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB
Desktop • Aug 18th, 2016
Pixel Fillrate
81.98 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
123 GTexel/s
100%
Radeon Pro WX 2100
Desktop • Jun 4th, 2017
Pixel Fillrate
19.5 GPixel/s
23%
Texel Fillrate
39.01 GTexel/s
31%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 3 GB | vs | AMD Radeon Pro WX 2100 |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 18th, 2016 | Release Date | Jun 4th, 2017 |
| GeForce 10 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
| $199 | MSRP | $149 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x DisplayPort, 2x mini-DisplayPort |
| 1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 GB | Memory | 2 GB |
| GDDR5 | Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Bus | 64-bit |
192.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 48 GB/s |
1506 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
1708 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1219 MHz |
2002 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
