Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 630 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1199 days newer than GeForce GT 630.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 630
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 65 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 86% better in Monster Hunter: World than GeForce GT 630 - 82 vs 44 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 - 4 vs 1 GB
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
GeForce GT 630
Desktop • May 15th, 2012
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 630 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2012 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 600 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
