Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 440 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1668 days newer than GeForce GT 440.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 440
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 65 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 500% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than GeForce GT 440 - 42 vs 7 FPS
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 - 4 vs 1 GB
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 1st, 2011
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 440 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
GeForce 400 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$79 | MSRP | $649 |
1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
1 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
DDR3 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
28.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
810 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |