Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms GeForce GT 430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 1781 days newer than GeForce GT 430.
Advantages of NVIDIA GeForce GT 430
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 49 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 42% better in Dead Space than GeForce GT 430 - 57 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 700% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 - 4 vs 0.5 GB
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GeForce GT 430
Desktop • Oct 11th, 2010
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
NVIDIA GeForce GT 430 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 11th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| GeForce 400 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| $79 | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 0.5 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 12.8 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 700 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
800 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
