Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 270 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 270 is 296 days older than Iris Graphics 6100.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Consumes up to 90% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 270 - 15 vs 150 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 270
- Performs up to 3% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Iris Graphics 6100 - 334 vs 323 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 270
Desktop • Nov 13th, 2013
Theoretical Performance
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
64%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 270 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2013 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $179 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 179.2 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 900 MHz |
1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 925 MHz |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
