Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 285 outperforms Iris Graphics 6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 285 is 3 days older than Iris Graphics 6100.
Advantages of Intel Iris Graphics 6100
- Consumes up to 92% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 285 - 15 vs 190 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 285
- Performs up to 36% better in No Man's Sky than Iris Graphics 6100 - 80 vs 59 FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Theoretical Performance
Iris Graphics 6100
Integrated • Sep 5th, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
6 GPixel/s
20%
Texel Fillrate
48 GTexel/s
46%
Radeon R9 285
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Pixel Fillrate
29.38 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
102.8 GTexel/s
100%
Intel Iris Graphics 6100 | vs | AMD Radeon R9 285 |
|---|---|---|
Sep 5th, 2014 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| HD Graphics-M | Generation | Volcanic Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $249 |
| Portable Device Dependent | Outputs | 2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 2x 6-pin |
Integrated | Segment | Desktop |
| System-Shared | Memory | 2 GB |
| System-Shared | Type | GDDR5 |
| System-Shared | Bus | 256-bit |
| System-Shared | Bandwidth | 176 GB/s |
| 300 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 918 MHz |
| 1000 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
| System-Shared | Memory Clock Speed | 1375 MHz |
