Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon Pro W5700 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 1276 days newer than Radeon Pro W5700.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 48% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon Pro W5700 - 71 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 32% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Radeon Pro W5700 - £6.13 vs £9.07 per FPS
- Consumes up to 20% less energy than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 165 vs 205 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon Pro W5700 - 16 vs 8 GB
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
71
100%
Value, £/FPS
£6.13/FPS
100%
Price, £
£435.24
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £435.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 404 minutes ago
Buy for £435.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 406 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Nov 19th, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
120.3 GPixel/s
99%
Texel Fillrate
270.7 GTexel/s
79%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | vs | Radeon Pro W5700 |
---|---|---|
May 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Nov 19th, 2019 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro |
$499 | MSRP | $799 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a, 1x USB Type-C |
1x 16-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 448 GB/s |
2310 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1400 MHz |
2535 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1880 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1750 MHz |