Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB outperforms Radeon PRO W7500 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB is 77 days older than Radeon PRO W7500.
Advantages of GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
- Performs up to 52% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon PRO W7500 - 131 vs 86 FPS
- Up to 27% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Radeon PRO W7500 - £3.67 vs £5.03 per FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon PRO W7500 - 16 vs 8 GB
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Consumes up to 58% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB - 70 vs 165 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
FPS
131
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.67/FPS
100%
Price, £
£480.12
90%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for £480.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7365 minutes ago
Buy for £432.42 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7365 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • May 18th, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
55%
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB | vs | Radeon PRO W7500 |
---|---|---|
May 18th, 2023 | Release Date | Aug 3rd, 2023 |
GeForce 40 | Generation | Radeon Pro Navi |
$499 | MSRP | $429 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 4x DisplayPort 2.1 |
1x 16-pin | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 172 GB/s |
2310 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1500 MHz |
2535 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1700 MHz |
2250 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 1344 MHz |