Key Differences
In short — Radeon PRO W7500 outperforms the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing GeForce GTX 1650 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon PRO W7500 is 1563 days newer than the cheaper GeForce GTX 1650.
Advantages of Radeon PRO W7500
- Performs up to 25% better in No Man's Sky than GeForce GTX 1650 - 114 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 70 vs 75 Watts
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 - 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of GeForce GTX 1650
- Up to 50% cheaper than Radeon PRO W7500 - £220.00 vs £440.99
- Up to 37% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Radeon PRO W7500 - £2.42 vs £3.87 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
FPS
114
100%
Value, £/FPS
£3.87/FPS
63%
Price, £
£440.99
49%
FPS Winner
Buy for £440.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 218 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
91
80%
Value, £/FPS
£2.42/FPS
100%
Price, £
£220
100%
Value Winner
Buy for £220 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Aug 3rd, 2023
Pixel Fillrate
108.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
190.4 GTexel/s
100%
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
49%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
49%
Radeon PRO W7500 | vs | GeForce GTX 1650 |
---|---|---|
Aug 3rd, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Radeon Pro Navi | Generation | GeForce 16 |
$429 | MSRP | $149 |
4x DisplayPort 2.1 | Outputs | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort |
None | Power Connectors | None |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR5 |
128-bit | Bus | 128-bit |
172 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128.1 GB/s |
1500 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1485 MHz |
1700 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 1665 MHz |
1344 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2001 MHz |