The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's £237.01 cheaper!
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 28% cheaper – £618.12 vs £855.13
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 120 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 6 GB
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Average FPS
83
100%
Min 1% FPS
44
100%
Price, £
£618.12
100%
Value, £/FPS
£7.44/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£618.12
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£712.65
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
81%
Min 1% FPS
33
75%
Price, £
£855.13
72%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
58%
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Feb 22nd, 2019
Memory
6 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
75%
Pixel Fillrate
84.96 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
169.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.437 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
75%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
94%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
94%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Feb 22nd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$279.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| GeForce 16 | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
120 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 6 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 192-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 288 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
84.96 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
169.9 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
5.437 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
