The Radeon R9 390 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's only £90.82 cheaper!
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- Up to 10% cheaper – £855.13 vs £945.95
- Consumes up to 5% less energy – 275 vs 290 Watts
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
49%
Min 1% FPS
33
41%
Price, £
£855.13
100%
Value, £/FPS
£12.76/FPS
54%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
136
100%
Min 1% FPS
81
100%
Price, £
£945.95
90%
Value, £/FPS
£6.95/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
£945.95
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£850.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
£876.20
In Stock
Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon R9 390 vs GeForce RTX 3070 Ti in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
63%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
47%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
24%
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti
May 31st, 2021
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
608.3 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
169.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
339.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
21.75 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon R9 390 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 3070 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 18th, 2015 | Release Date | May 31st, 2021 |
$329.00 | MSRP | $599.00 |
| Pirate Islands | Generation | GeForce 30 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
275 W | Power Consumption | 290 W |
| Memory | ||
| 8 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6X |
| 512-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 608.3 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 64 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 169.9 GPixel/s |
| 160 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 339.8 GTexel/s |
| 5.12 TFLOPS | FP32 | 21.75 TFLOPS |
