Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R7 260X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 688 days newer than Radeon R7 260X.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R7 260X
- Consumes up to 34% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 115 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 72% better in Fortnite than Radeon R7 260X - 69 vs 40 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R7 260X - 4 vs 2 GB
Fortnite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 8th, 2013
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
AMD Radeon R7 260X | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
---|---|---|
Oct 8th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
$139 | MSRP | $649 |
2x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x DisplayPort | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
1x 6-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
GDDR5 | Type | HBM |
128-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
104 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
1100 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
Not Available | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
1625 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |