Key Differences
In short — Radeon R9 Nano outperforms Radeon R5 240 OEM on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Radeon R9 Nano is 664 days newer than Radeon R5 240 OEM.
Advantages of AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM
- Consumes up to 71% less energy than AMD Radeon R9 Nano - 50 vs 175 Watts
Advantages of AMD Radeon R9 Nano
- Performs up to 34% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Radeon R5 240 OEM - 94 vs 70 FPS
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory than AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM - 4 vs 2 GB
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Radeon R9 Nano
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2015
Theoretical Performance
Radeon R5 240 OEM
Desktop • Nov 1st, 2013
Pixel Fillrate
6.24 GPixel/s
9%
Texel Fillrate
18.72 GTexel/s
7%
AMD Radeon R5 240 OEM | vs | AMD Radeon R9 Nano |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 27th, 2015 |
| Volcanic Islands | Generation | Pirate Islands |
| Not Available | MSRP | $649 |
| 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA | Outputs | 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort |
| None | Power Connectors | 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 GB | Memory | 4 GB |
| DDR3 | Type | HBM |
| 64-bit | Bus | 4096-bit |
| 14.4 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| 730 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 1000 MHz |
| 780 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | Not Available |
900 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 500 MHz |
