Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen Threadripper 3970X outperforms the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 3970X is 1126 days newer than the more expensive Xeon E5-2699A v4.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Performs up to 3% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 161 vs 157 FPS
- Up to 23% cheaper than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $1319.82 vs $1711.71
- Up to 25% better value when playing Red Dead Redemption 2 than Xeon E5-2699A v4 - $8.20 vs $10.90 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 64 vs 44 threads
Advantages of Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 145 vs 280 Watts
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1319.82
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,319.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 137 minutes ago
Buy for €1,711.71 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Broadwell |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 22 |
64 | Threads | 44 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | 145 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |