Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-13400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-13400F is 1136 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 3970X.
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper 3970X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 64 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - 458 vs 426 FPS
- Up to 42% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $765.76 vs $1319.82
- Up to 46% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 3970X - $1.67 vs $3.10 per FPS
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
FPS
426
93%
Value, €/FPS
€3.1/FPS
54%
Price, €
€1319.82
58%
Buy for €1,319.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8465 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
458
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€765.76
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8464 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 25th, 2019
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Ryzen Threadripper 3970X | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 25th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Core i5 |
Castle Peak | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket TRX4 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 10 |
64 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
280 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |