The Ryzen 3 3300X is a clear winner – it's at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's only $35.11 more expensive!
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3300X
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 28% cheaper – $91.91 vs $127.02
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
192
100%
Min 1% FPS
127
100%
Price, €
€127.02
72%
Value, €/FPS
€0.66/FPS
83%
Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Ryzen 3 3300X vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Ryzen 3 3300X
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
92%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
86%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Ryzen 3 3300X | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$120.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Matisse | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
16 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 3200 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
