Buy on Amazon
€91.91
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP $169
Availability
MSRP $169
AvailabilityMSRP $299
Availability
MSRP $299
Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5700X outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 5700X is 3450 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 30% cheaper than Ryzen 7 5700X - $82.80 vs $117.68
- Up to 24% better value when playing Dead Space than Ryzen 7 5700X - $0.63 vs $0.83 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700X
- Performs up to 9% better in Dead Space than FX-8320 - 158 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
OEM AMD FX-8320 Octa-core (8 Core) 3.50 GHz Processor - Socket AM3+ Pack
Buy for €91.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 71 minutes ago
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor
Buy for €130.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 80 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-8320
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Ryzen 7 5700X
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 7 5700X |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
| FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Vishera | Codename | Vermeer |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 125 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 17.5x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
