Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12600KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-12600KF is 3299 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 29% cheaper than Core i5-12600KF - $82.80 vs $117.33
- Up to 18% better value when playing Deathloop than Core i5-12600KF - $0.55 vs $0.67 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-12600KF
- Performs up to 15% better in Deathloop than FX-8320 - 194 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 16 vs 8 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €91.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
194
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
82%
Price, €
€130.24
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for €130.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 85 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Core i5-12600KF |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Vishera | Codename | Alder Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |