Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-12400F outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-12400F is 1608 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-12400F
- Performs up to 9% better in HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 214 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 82% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $81.41 vs $454.77
- Up to 84% better value when playing HITMAN 3 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.42 vs $2.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-12400F - 32 vs 12 threads
HITMAN 3
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
214
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.37
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €90.37 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 95 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
197
92%
Value, €/FPS
€2.56/FPS
16%
Price, €
€504.79
17%
Buy for €504.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 96 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-12400F | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |