Buy on Amazon
€166.38
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $329
Availability
MSRP in USD: $329
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $999
Availability
MSRP in USD: $999
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 696 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 3% better in Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 229 vs 222 FPS
- Up to 8% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $149.89 vs $162.14
- Up to 10% better value when playing Death Stranding than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - $0.73 vs $0.81 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 3700X - 32 vs 16 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
229
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€166.38
100%
FPS and Value Winner
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core, 16-Thread Unlocked Desktop Processor with Wraith Prism LED Cooler
Buy for €166.38 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8927 minutes ago
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
222
96%
Value, €/FPS
€0.81/FPS
90%
Price, €
€179.98
92%
AMD YD195XA8AEWOF Ryzen Threadripper 1950X (16-core/32-thread) Desktop Processor
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8927 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
| Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 8 | Cores | 16 |
| 16 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.