Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen Threadripper 1950X is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 1547 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen Threadripper 1950X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 31% better in Dota 2 than Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 255 vs 195 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X
- Up to 59% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - $162.14 vs $392.64
- Up to 46% better value when playing Dota 2 than Core i9-12900K - $0.92 vs $1.71 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900K - 32 vs 24 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
255
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.71/FPS
53%
Price, €
€435.83
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €435.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3347 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
195
76%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€179.98
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €179.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Alder Lake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 16 |
24 | Threads | 32 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |