Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600G outperforms the cheaper FX-8320 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8320 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600G is 3094 days newer than the cheaper FX-8320.
Advantages of FX-8320
- Up to 27% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600G - $82.80 vs $113.62
- Up to 20% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Ryzen 5 5600G - $0.79 vs $0.99 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 5600G
- Performs up to 9% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-8320 - 127 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-8320 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8320 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8320 doesn't have integrated graphics
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €91.91 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 69 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
FPS
127
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.99/FPS
80%
Price, €
€126.12
72%
FPS Winner
Buy for €126.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 77 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Desktop • Apr 13th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
FX-8320 | vs | Ryzen 5 5600G |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 13th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Vishera | Codename | Cezanne |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |