The FX-8320 is the comparison's loser – it's at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Ryzen 3 3100 and it's also a much worse value for money, as it's $26.15 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Ryzen 3 3100
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 28% cheaper – $65.76 vs $91.91
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 3100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
124
100%
Price, €
€65.76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.34/FPS
100%
FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 3100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 3100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-8320 vs Ryzen 3 3100 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 3 3100
Apr 24th, 2020
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-8320 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Ryzen 3 3100 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
| $169.00 | MSRP | $99.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
| Vishera | Codename | Matisse |
| 125 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
8 | Cores | 4 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.9 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | No |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
