Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700K outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-14700K is 341 days newer than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-14700K - 32 vs 28 threads
Advantages of Core i7-14700K
- Performs up to 7% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than EPYC 9174F - 248 vs 231 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
248
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€296.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €296.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6647 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Core i7-14700K |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 |
Not Available | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 20 |
32 | Threads | 28 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
320 W | TDP | Not Available |
5 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |