Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms EPYC 9174F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 65 days newer than EPYC 9174F.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7600 - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 6% better in Sea of Thieves than EPYC 9174F - 276 vs 261 FPS
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 65 vs 320 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 9174F doesn't have integrated graphics
Sea of Thieves
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
276
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€166.67
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €166.67 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6635 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Mythical
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Not Available | Codename | Raphael |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |