Key Differences
In short — EPYC 9174F outperforms Ryzen 7 5700 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 9174F is 220 days newer than Ryzen 7 5700.
Advantages of EPYC 9174F
- Performs up to 6% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Ryzen 7 5700 - 478 vs 449 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 5700 - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Ryzen 7 5700
- Consumes up to 80% less energy than AMD EPYC 9174F - 65 vs 320 Watts
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
FPS
449
94%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€114.41
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €114.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6813 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Nov 10th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 9174F | vs | Ryzen 7 5700 |
---|---|---|
Nov 10th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 4th, 2022 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Not Available | Codename | Not Available |
AMD Socket SP5 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
4.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
320 W | TDP | 65 W |
5 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
41.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |