The Core i9-14900F is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-6100, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $422.37 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i9-14900F
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Up to 94% cheaper – $26.71 vs $449.08
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i9-14900F cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i9-14900F vs FX-6100 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
218
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, €
€449.08
5%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
8%
Core i9-14900F vs FX-6100 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-14900F vs FX-6100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-14900F vs FX-6100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-14900F
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
61%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
25%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
62%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i9-14900F | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
$524.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Not Available | Power Consumption | 95 W |
Performance | ||
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
2.0 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
36 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 5600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
No | Overclockable | Yes |