The FX-6100 is the comparison's loser – it's a slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-660 and it's also a worse value for money, as it's $1.49 more expensive!
Advantages of the FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 6 vs 4 threads
Advantages of the Core i5-660
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Up to 6% cheaper – $25.22 vs $26.71
- A better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 23% less energy – 73 vs 95 Watts
FX-6100 vs Core i5-660 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
168
100%
Min 1% FPS
113
100%
Price, €
€25.22
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
FX-6100 vs Core i5-660 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The FX-6100 vs Core i5-660 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The FX-6100 vs Core i5-660 in core CPU performance specifications
FX-6100
Oct 12th, 2011
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
99%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-660
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
4 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.33 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
FX-6100 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-660 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $196.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1156 |
| Zambezi | Codename | Clarkdale |
| 95 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 2 |
6 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
8 MB | L3 Cache | 4 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3 @ 1333 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
