Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-13900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-13900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 468 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-13900K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-13900K - 110 vs 109 FPS
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Up to 5% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $413.51 vs $436.94
- Up to 5% better value when playing Cyberpunk 2077 than Core i9-14900F - $3.79 vs $3.97 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Cyberpunk 2077
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.97/FPS
95%
Price, €
€436.94
94%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4236 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
109
99%
Value, €/FPS
€3.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€413.51
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €413.51 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4237 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
RT Overdrive
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |