Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-14900 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900F and the more expensive Core i9-14900 have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Core i9-14900 - 140 vs 139 FPS
- Up to 16% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $436.94 vs $517.79
- Up to 16% better value when playing Elden Ring than Core i9-14900 - $3.12 vs $3.73 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€436.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
Buy for €517.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 366 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900F | vs | Core i9-14900 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 24 |
32 | Threads | 32 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | No |