Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1348 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900K.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900K - 162 vs 138 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-10900K - $3.20 vs $3.43 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Up to 9% cheaper than Core i9-14900 - $472.97 vs $517.79
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€517.79
91%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €517.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 223 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |