Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-14900 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-14900 is 1348 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Core i9-14900
- Performs up to 12% better in God of War than Core i9-10900F - 199 vs 178 FPS
- Up to 7% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $517.79 vs $555.82
- Up to 17% better value when playing God of War than Core i9-10900F - $2.60 vs $3.12 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 32 vs 20 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
199
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€517.79
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €517.79 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 332 minutes ago
Buy for €555.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 333 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-14900 | vs | Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 10 |
32 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |