Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900F is 194 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-10920X.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Up to 12% cheaper than Core i9-10920X - $555.82 vs $629.73
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-10920X - $4.03 vs $4.56 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-10920X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-10900F - 24 vs 20 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
138
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.03/FPS
100%
Price, €
€555.82
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €555.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
Buy for €629.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 219 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i9-10920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2019 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 Extreme |
Comet Lake | Codename | Cascade Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 12 |
20 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |