In Battlefield 6, the Core i9-10900F is slightly faster than the Core i9-10920X. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i9-10900F
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6 – 88 vs 87 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 months and 11 days newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Oct 19, 2019
- Is 6 months and 11 days newer
- Consumes up to 61% less energy – 65 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 61% less energy
Core i9-10920X
No clear advantages
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-10920X: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
87 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
65 FPS
98%
Price, $
$869.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$9.99/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-10920X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i9-10900F vs Core i9-10920X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i9-10900F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
10-core
83%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Core i9-10920X
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
12-core
100%
L3 Cache
19.25 MB
96%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
92%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i9-10900F Apr 30th, 2020 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10920X Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| $464.00 | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1200 | Socket | LGA2066 |
65 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 2933 MHz (DDR4) | RAM | DDR4 |
| No Integrated Graphics | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
