Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i9-10900K outperforms the more expensive Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i9-10900K and the more expensive Core i9-10900F have been released at the same time.
Advantages of Core i9-10900F
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 65 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 1% better in No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - 182 vs 181 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than Core i9-10900F - $472.97 vs $555.82
- Up to 15% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Core i9-10900F - $2.60 vs $3.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €555.82 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€472.97
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-10900F | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 10 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |