Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 5161 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Core i7-920
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $79.28 vs $765.76
- Up to 87% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i5-13400F - $0.68 vs $5.24 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 26% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Core i7-920 - 146 vs 116 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 16 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
116
79%
Value, €/FPS
€0.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
146
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.24/FPS
13%
Price, €
€765.76
10%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7383 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
45 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |