Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7600 outperforms the cheaper Core i7-920 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-920 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 7600 is 5171 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-920.
Advantages of Core i7-920
- Up to 56% cheaper than Ryzen 5 7600 - $71.42 vs $160.63
- Up to 45% better value when playing DOOM Eternal than Ryzen 5 7600 - $0.18 vs $0.33 per FPS
Advantages of Ryzen 5 7600
- Performs up to 22% better in DOOM Eternal than Core i7-920 - 547 vs 449 FPS
- Consumes up to 50% less energy than Intel Core i7-920 - 65 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-920 - 12 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-920 doesn't have integrated graphics
DOOM Eternal
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
449
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€79.28
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €79.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
Buy for €178.3 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 103 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Nightmare
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-920 | vs | Ryzen 5 7600 |
---|---|---|
Nov 17th, 2008 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Bloomfield | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
2.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 65 W |
45 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |