Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 2682 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Up to 91% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $72.08 vs $765.76
- Up to 89% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-13400F - $0.57 vs $5.17 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 17% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i7-6700T - 148 vs 127 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 16 vs 8 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
127
86%
Value, €/FPS
€0.57/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7569 minutes ago
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7568 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |