Key Differences
In short — Core i7-14700F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-6700T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-6700T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-14700F is 3051 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-6700T.
Advantages of Core i7-6700T
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i7-14700F - $72.08 vs $246.11
- Up to 64% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-14700F - $0.43 vs $1.18 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-14700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i7-14700F
- Performs up to 24% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Core i7-6700T - 209 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-6700T - 28 vs 8 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
169
81%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€72.08
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €72.08 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7390 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.18/FPS
36%
Price, €
€246.11
29%
FPS Winner
Buy for €246.11 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7389 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-6700T | vs | Core i7-14700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Skylake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 20 |
8 | Threads | 28 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
HD Graphics 530 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |