Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-5930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-5930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 3416 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-5930K.
Advantages of Core i7-5930K
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i9-14900F - $321.95 vs $436.94
- Up to 17% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i9-14900F - $2.66 vs $3.19 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 13% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i7-5930K - 137 vs 121 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-5930K - 32 vs 12 threads
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
FPS
121
88%
Value, €/FPS
€2.66/FPS
100%
Price, €
€321.95
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €321.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 268 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
83%
Price, €
€436.94
73%
FPS Winner
Buy for €436.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 266 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-5930K | vs | Core i9-14900F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 24 |
12 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |