Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Core i7-4930K
- Up to 88% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $88.29 vs $765.76
- Up to 83% better value when playing Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i5-13400F - $0.19 vs $1.14 per FPS
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 44% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i7-4930K - 672 vs 468 FPS
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
468
70%
Value, €/FPS
€0.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
672
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.14/FPS
17%
Price, €
€765.76
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €765.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7384 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4930K | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |