Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-4930K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-4930K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-13700K is 3313 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-4930K.
Advantages of Core i7-4930K
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i7-13700K - $88.29 vs $279.28
- Up to 59% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-13700K - $0.52 vs $1.28 per FPS
Advantages of Core i7-13700K
- Performs up to 28% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i7-4930K - 219 vs 171 FPS
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Core i7-4930K - 125 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-4930K - 24 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-4930K doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
FPS
171
78%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€88.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €88.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.28/FPS
41%
Price, €
€279.28
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €279.28 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7112 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-4930K | vs | Core i7-13700K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i7 |
Ivy Bridge E | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 16 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
130 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |