The Core i7-3930K is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $160.34 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-3930K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 64% cheaper – $91.91 vs $252.25
- A much better value for money for gaming
- Consumes up to 4% less energy – 125 vs 130 Watts
- Has an integrated GPU, while the Core i7-3930K cannot run games without a dedicated GPU
Core i7-3930K vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
114
100%
Price, €
€252.25
36%
Value, €/FPS
€1.48/FPS
37%
Core i7-3930K vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3930K vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3930K
Nov 14th, 2011
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
97%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-3930K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
---|---|---|
General | ||
Nov 14th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
$583.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Sandy Bridge E | Codename | Vishera |
130 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
Performance | ||
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
3.2 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
Other Features | ||
DDR3 @ 1600 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
No | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |