Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 2923 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 62% cheaper than Core i9-10900K - $181.14 vs $472.97
- Up to 51% better value when playing Rust than Core i9-10900K - $1.10 vs $2.24 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 28% better in Rust than Core i7-3770K - 211 vs 165 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 20 vs 8 threads
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
165
78%
Value, €/FPS
€1.1/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €181.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 229 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
211
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.24/FPS
49%
Price, €
€472.97
38%
FPS Winner
Buy for €472.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 230 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |