In Battlefield 6, the Core i7-3770K is much slower than the Core i9-14900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $320 cheaper!
Core i7-3770K
- Up to 71% cheaper – $132.22 vs $452.68
- Up to 71% cheaper
- Up to 36% better value in Battlefield 6 – $2.13 vs $3.32/FPS
- Up to 36% better value in Battlefield 6
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 77 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 38% less energy
Core i9-14900K
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6 – 136 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 119% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 11 years and 5 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-14900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
62 FPS
46%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
46%
Price, $
$132.22
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.13/FPS
100%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Average FPS
136 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
102 FPS
100%
Price, $
$452.68
29%
Value, $/FPS
$3.32/FPS
64%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-14900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-3770K vs Core i9-14900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-3770K
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
17%
L3 Cache
8 MB
22%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
65%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
29%
Core i9-14900K
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i7-3770K Apr 29th, 2012 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-14900K Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Apr 29th, 2012 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
$313.00 | MSRP | $589.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1155 | Socket | LGA1700 |
77 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| 1600 MHz (DDR3) | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
