Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 4188 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $129.94 vs $351.43
- Up to 57% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i9-14900K - $1.12 vs $2.58 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 17% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3770K - 151 vs 129 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
129
85%
Value, €/FPS
€1.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€144.23
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €144.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
151
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.58/FPS
43%
Price, €
€390.09
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €390.09 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
77 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |