Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Core i7-3770K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i7-3770K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 3803 days newer than the cheaper Core i7-3770K.
Advantages of Core i7-3770K
- Up to 60% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - $181.14 vs $450.34
- Up to 45% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-13900K - $0.78 vs $1.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 77 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 35% better in Lost Ark than Core i7-3770K - 314 vs 232 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-3770K - 32 vs 8 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
FPS
232
74%
Value, €/FPS
€0.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€181.14
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €181.14 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 217 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
314
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.43/FPS
55%
Price, €
€450.34
40%
FPS Winner
Buy for €450.34 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 227 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i7-3770K | vs | Core i9-13900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 29th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Core i7 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |