The Core i7-2700K is a much faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a worse value for money, as it's $61.14 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i7-2700K
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 24% less energy – 95 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 40% cheaper – $91.91 vs $153.05
- A slightly better value for money for gaming
Core i7-2700K vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i7-2700K
Oct 24th, 2011
Average FPS
171
100%
Min 1% FPS
115
100%
Price, €
€153.05
60%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
62%
Core i7-2700K vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i7-2700K vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i7-2700K vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i7-2700K
Oct 24th, 2011
Cores
4-core
50%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.7 GHz
95%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i7-2700K | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 24th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| $332.00 | MSRP | $169.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
95 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 3.7 GHz |
| 8 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 @ 1333 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
