The Core i5-10600 is at least 2x faster gaming CPU than the FX-8320, however, it's a much worse value for money, as it's $385.53 more expensive!
Advantages of the Core i5-10600
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 48% less energy – 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 12 vs 8 threads
Advantages of the FX-8320
- Up to 81% cheaper – $91.90 vs $477.43
- A better value for money for gaming
Core i5-10600 vs FX-8320 for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i5-10600
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
210
100%
Min 1% FPS
145
100%
Price, €
€477.43
19%
Value, €/FPS
€2.27/FPS
22%
Core i5-10600 vs FX-8320 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i5-10600 vs FX-8320 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i5-10600 vs FX-8320 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i5-10600
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
75%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
FX-8320
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
67%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
83%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i5-10600 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | FX-8320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $1.69 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
| Comet Lake | Codename | Vishera |
65 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Performance | ||
| 6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.5 GHz |
4.8 GHz | Turbo Frequency | 4.0 GHz |
12 MB | L3 Cache | 8 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR4 @ 2666 MHz | RAM | DDR3 |
| UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
