Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900K outperforms the cheaper Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-9100F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-14900K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Core i3-9100F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-14900K - $56.81 vs $346.43
- Up to 80% better value when playing FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i9-14900K - $0.25 vs $1.26 per FPS
Advantages of Core i9-14900K
- Performs up to 23% better in FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker than Core i3-9100F - 304 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 32 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
FINAL FANTASY XIV: Endwalker
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
FPS
248
82%
Value, €/FPS
€0.25/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 94 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
304
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.26/FPS
20%
Price, €
€384.54
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €384.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 93 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-9100F | vs | Core i9-14900K |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |